“The anti-tank missiles have a longer range than the tank cannon,” Hertling pointed out. The M-2 can fire its 50-pound, wire-guided TOW missiles out to a distance of two miles. Army general who commanded an M-3, a scout version of the M-2, in Desert Storm. is not a tank, but it can be a tank-killer,” tweeted Mark Hertling, a retired U.S. Army took from the 1991 war was that the M-2, even in its immature form, was a highly capable anti-armor platform. When they fired the TOWs, they went where they shot them.” “So the Bradleys could see these MTLBs through this stuff at longer ranges and pick them up quicker, and the TOW missiles were dead reliable. “Keep in mind the Bradley fighting vehicle’s ‘doghouse’ for its thermal sight is about 13 inches higher than the M-1’s,” Bloedorn said. The M-2’s height-10 feet from the bottom of the tracks to the top of the turret-actually helped crews surveil targets. Gary Bloedorn, an analyst with the Institute for Defense Analyses, described the Bradley’s advantages in a 1992 study of 73 Easting.Įarly in the battle, the 2nd ACR’s Bradleys with their long-range optics spotted Iraqi MTLB scout vehicles many hundreds of yards away. The M-2s in the course of the battle fired more than a hundred TOW anti-tank missiles from their turret-mounted twin launchers-to devastating effect. The 2nd ACR lost one Bradley and six soldiers killed. The Iraqis lost around 400 vehicles and as many as a thousand soldiers killed. Army’s 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment, with a hundred M-2s and a hundred M-1 tanks, dismantled two Iraqi army brigades. At the Battle of 73 Easting in southern Iraq on Feb. The M-2 was still a young design when the United States and its allies went to war with Iraq in 1991. Army’s first true IFV, and it didn’t enter service until 1981-nearly 25 years after the HS.30 first appeared. The Americans lagged far behind in mechanized infantry technology.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |